Estimated reading time: 2 mins
Barack Obama has publicly stated (I assume in his Government, should he get in) that organizations who outsource overseas won’t get tax breaks. What tax breaks though? In the US, organizations don’t get tax breaks specifically for this. And what has an organization’s choice of outsourcing got to do with politics, I would add – surely the leaders of these organizations have their stockholders to answer to?
Maybe Barack is trying to win over the blue-collar masses of the US, but has he got his facts straight, and is it the right call to make?
Ann All on the IT Business Edge blog (link below) has commented on this issue on the IT Business Edge blog. Ann thinks that Obama’s statements are really addressing the migration of manufacturing work, but a blanket statement like this isn’t applicable carte blanche. The basis of the debate is Obama’s Patriot Employer Act which sets to provide incentives (in the form of tax credit) to American employers to create the right balance between US jobs and overseas jobs. On the face of it, it makes sense. But if you look into the matter deeper, should IT organizations who offshore part of their operation be worried?
Yes, I think. Outsourcing overseas has risen because of cheaper overseas labor costs, which means that overall, companies can remain competitive in the global market. True. But that isn’t it. The other fact is that the US, in the long run, cannot sustain the number of skilled workers to cope with demand. Growth is being inhibited due to the shortage of skilled workers. This is what is happening in India, right now. But the Indian education system is capable of churning out many more PhDs in appropriate business functions than the US is. I don’t think Obama should be penalizing organizations who tap into this human capital to achieve their business objectives.
So my prediction, should this go ahead, is an organizational conflict between the positive discrimination to the point of affirmative action towards US workers against what makes economic and business sense. IT managers are going to be stuck between a rock and a hard place, and will be further restricted by yet another corporate obstacle. Organizations will be led to make a compromise (or pay through the nose) to keep within quotas. But let me just clarify my point – I am all in favor of arresting the dwindling of the US tech sector – for sure. But is this the way to do it?
Hey, I am still thinking this one through and I haven’t concluded my thoughts on this – something instinctive tells me this is the wrong way to go. What are your thoughts? Please tell me!