-

Follow Me
Recent Comments
- Simon Stapleton on “The Industrialization of IT” - Eric D. Brown on You Must Industrialize IT to Secure your Organization’s Future
- Simon Stapleton on “The Industrialization of IT” - Eric D. Brown on Industrialization of IT Will Create a Blue-Collar Sub-Class of IT Workers
- Joyful Days on Who Would You Throw Your Shoes At?
- Education, Nonstop - The Core Benefits of Continuing Education on What Is Job Security (and does it really exist?)
- poloalb on Do We Have to be Articulate to be an Executive?
My Tweets...
- New blog post: Stand Up and Be Counted (in Meetings) http://t.co/jfBj4pPZ
- New blog post: How To Make a Great Impression at an Interview http://t.co/jWSGkF9x
- New blog post: Copying Ideas is the Shortcut to Success http://t.co/dUczJQJ3
- New blog post: How New Managers Can Get To Know Their Employees http://t.co/9dgCns56
- New blog post: Ask Yourself the RIGHT Question http://t.co/7zxCJpsC
Sponsored Links
Jobs in Your Area

You know, I agree with you there…
Measuring to the process is only good if the process in place is the best way to attain the objective. If following the process does not result in the most effective return on investment, modify the process.
One should note that a lot of things can’t be quantifies on a spreadsheet. Some people disagree with that, saying anything can be measured. I disagree.
For example: asking people how whether they would buy product A will yield different results than measuring actual sales of product A. Why? Because different elements are involved in the two decisions.
Asking a client whether he’s happy with service is different than having the client renew the service contract.
Ask a business unit director whether he’s satisfied with the performance of the IT team that provides its services, and you’ll get an answer. You unfortunately don’t know what he says to his friends at home about his IT service team.
Developing a close–and I mean close, almost intimate–relationship with the business people is the only way to accurately measure performance for the IT team. This, most outside-facing organizations know. IT has a captive customer-base who is des-incetivized about speaking the real truth. The real test in the outside marketplace is whether customers are buying from you or from your competitors. In a company, unless it is as easy to use either IT or an outside vendor (it never is), there is no true “invisible hand of the market” that forces most-efficient decisions. Instead, the company must rely on the whoever takes care the oth business-IT interaction to be smart, ethical, capable, and empowered. It’s going to be hard to create a paper process that will make things as efficient as that.
Thus the Business Analyst is really acting as a broker/agent. In the outside world, these people are rewarded by lots of money, and they are ranked and their success recognized by how much money they bring in. Internally, you have no such measure.
It’s a tough one. I say pay the business analyst a percentage of the project budget upon milestone success. You’ll drive the best and the brightest toward the best and most valuable projects.
I think.
Thoughts?